Satraps IN HISTORY

Those could be identified as current sapatras are not directly elected by the king, no, it is possible that the post will win by very restricted, difficult, corporate competitions, which very few have access, and once approved and obtained the post life enables them to make any decisions deemed appropriate by the position they hold.

Nobody can doubt his decisions, and even bend the power that the politicians in power are awarded citizens by supposedly democratic free elections.



's satraps were elected directly by King, usually between members of the nobility. 
was exercised judicial and administrative power, collected taxes, were in charge of public order and to recruit and retain military. The Emperor himself was responsible for the supervision and control to prevent exceed their duties.

Administration through satrapies and the title of satrap itself were preserved, even for officials Greek Macedonians, Alexander the Great, who conquered the Persian Empire and even expanded, and their successors, the Diadochi (and their dynasties) who divided it, especially in the Selucida Empire, where the satrap was generally designated as strategos;., but their provinces were much smaller than those that kept the Persians


+ + + + +





To satiety hear repeated phrase that all or almost all the extras on duty, women and men repeat when asked. 
Both consumers and say "respect judicial decisions," so it goes until the next time you are repeating the same.

And why?. 
's equate to a Similar category to which the Pope was granted once?. Decide and resolve ex cathedra the truth always on their side?.

No doubt his honesty, of course, as would not doubt the honesty of anyone and even proving otherwise. 
I no longer trust anything or anyone. And if I stick to this rule, which is mine, I do not trust that their judgment is infallible or always consistent with what we understand to be right, not the law.
laws sometimes they are incorrect or ethical, or even honest, this proven and known that the laws have adapted to the course of history, wars, tyrants in power and political expediency, and now that they do not have to be.
Or is that someone is so naive to think that the law is immutable, always be honest, fair and equitable, that have never covered the tyrants, the absolutist kings, gentlemen, finally to power?.
law is correct that executes him with capital punishment on a prisoner after twenty years of being in death row?.
's more correct law that sets free consummate murderers after even fewer years of being in prison?.

they are current examples, different countries, different criteria to legislate or judge, but these present times.
's right here it is right there?, is ethical to condemn to death and execute an inmate in Europe?, and in USA.
satraps Come gentlemen on duty was not have truth and justice on hand, never have had it done, and therefore I have, have, have to respect judicial decisions?, you do not have to abide by when resources fail only and exclusively ABIDE not respect of what we mean respect for an ethical, honest and correct action. No, that you do not have respect for me, keep my approach consistent with my conscience free man who respect the true justice that dictate ethics, honesty, sense of duty, compassion, charity, solidarity, respect for life, and all the virtues that make the human being a unique specimen, but also what denigrates when none of these ethical standards are met by.

therefore I do not trust that the laws are fair, depends on where and when to apply. 
depends on the human judgment subject to many errors if not the future of the social, political and economic history of the country.

Here in Europe, and in Spain, the feeling that new "satraps" decide almost everything, any bill that I made, in Parliament or by the Government, is trapped in the hands of justice, or of the judges is the same, all at the whim of the opponent turn.  
A draft leya that does not respect life, or if the respects, is challenged and the satraps are the ones who decide. You should go to file and decides whether the satrap going by car, foot, helicopter or as I please get, no, you decide to go you have to walk to be chillen me or throw tomatoes. If it were me dentenido lead police on cell car, but if this "free" will testify as I please, sir, and I think I attended law to do so.

And everything starts to be the same, these modern satraps are that "ultimately" decide on life or freedom "to anyone who has the misfortune to get in his hands.

Constitucinal What I Wear, I take it to the Supreme, took him to the Court of Human Rights, we carry .... .. wherever, provided legislative INITIATIVES stop or projects to solve the problems facing our society.
That it is the mantra of any politician who does not like what his opponent in the government, all the same, recourse to the supreme power of the satraps of turn.

exists overspending in any public or private institution, is about giving rules (right or wrong) to understand who has the power to take them Democr ..... and stop, takes the Supreme, the Police Court, the Prosecutor, the Judge on duty, but those standards are sine die, stalled indefinitely.

these measures by the judge, supreme, constitutional, or whoever were rejected ..... . everything falls apart, and we are back worse than before it is solved or not solved anything. 
sinks, close, stop action, some happy (for a short time sometimes) and others feeling frustrated unable to do anything.

Whatever your take whatever the Supreme or Constitutional, and you'll see. derrogo If that is not good for your laws and put mine instead.

You'll find out when I send. ...... and so once, and another, and another.
And the courts, the judges, the courts enter the cloth whenever they are dating or were carrying a cause for their opinion.

're new satraps of this sociendad in which I no longer understand anything.

And I am asked to respect the "judgments" do like them, apparently sent by shifts?.

going to be no, because I do not have use that phrase because some of their resolutions do not like, and that way I do not have to respect them because in my opinion do not affect me personally or in the sense that I understand as fair.

This is a review, which currently I temos a right to express it, but not for how long.





's gatufo