Datos personales

Mi foto
Mi mas oculto deseo fue siempre ser escritor y aprender varios idiomas. He llegado a defenderme bien en Ingles y chapurrear algo de Frances. El cine y la fotografia me fascinan. La música, de todo tipo, ha sido siempre mi relax. La amistad la valora mas que a nada en la vida.

martes, 23 de julio de 2013

IGNORANCE OR FAILURE TO MEMORY


 




Ignorant, or forgetful, not what we are in this country
called Spain at the moment.
The only two confidence motions were lost by whoever presented, one by little, the other by a landslide.
And opposition shoddy who threat?
But anyone can believe such a thing would be presented to slay his candidate?
Candidate?. There is a Candidate?
If not they agree with who the candidate. Do not know if this country is not a disaster, if he had not stolen so much,  if the funding of politicians, parties, and all those weeds out otherwise. Well do not talk about unions, as they financed?
Or other estates as the Church, etc.. etc.
In order to this, to me, it seems theater.
I'm sorry but it is what I think, theater in which the work is known from beginning to end, and the worst is that no one believes what he sees.
Even the date....first of August? to an explanation....ridiculous.
Millions are out on holidays, and periodists are just the same. OUT.
So, who is going to see it, or to inform about the president speech.
I think no body is interested about the subject, thoughts are form already and nothing is going to change.
A little information about censure motions never hurts:
*****
The figure of the censure motion is reflected in the Spanish Constitution, in particular Articles 113 and 114 and Articles 175-179 of the Rules of the Congress of Deputies and is a procedure that necessarily leads including the proposal of a candidate Prime Minister.  
That is, if the PSOE take the step of presenting to decide whether a candidate Rubalcaba presents. 
The motion must be constructive, ie the proposal, which must be supported by at least one tenth of the Deputies, must include a candidate for Prime Minister.
 Another figure that includes the Constitution is the 'trust issue', where is the prime minister who may use it to force parliamentary favor in times of crisis or loss of support.
 In both cases the absolute parliamentary majority is fundamental and decisive pull down that allows the motion of censure or gain confidence. 
The motion, once introduced in Congress, may not be voted on until five days after its submission. In the first two days of this period, alternative motions may be submitted. In paragraph 4, Article 113 provides that in the event that the no confidence motion was passed by Congress, its signatories may not submit another during the same session.
Article 114.2 of the Constitution provides that if Congress adopts a motion of censure, the Government will submit his resignation to the King and the candidate included in that are deemed to have the confidence of the House for the purposes specified in Article 99 of the Constitution. The King shall appoint him prime minister.
Since the adoption of the Constitution in 1978, there were two motions of no confidence in Spain. In 1980, the PSOE was presented the first motion of censure of democracy against the Government of the CDS and the president Adolfo Suarez. While Suarez was victorious, the chroniclers of the time believe that was the beginning of the end for UCD. PSOE The motion was put forth and defended in Congress by Alfonso Guerra and presidential candidate proposed by the PSOE was Felipe González. The motion was rejected by 166 deputies of the centrists, who remained alone as 21 deputies abstained, including 9 Popular Coalition and Minority 7 Catalana. The votes in favor of the motion were 152 (socialists, communists, Andalusians and 3 mixed group). In the end, the PSOE lacked 24 votes to take Suarez and getting the government.

The second, the People's Alliance filed against the socialist government of Felipe González, the March 23, 1987. As before, the censure motion was rejected with the result of 195 votes against (PSOE, Izquierda Unida, PNV, USA), 67 in favor (AP and Valencian Union) and 70 abstentions (CDS, CiU, PDP, PL , PAR, AIC and CG). Popular Alliance, whose candidate in the motion was Hernández Mancha, tried the same thing they had done with the CDS socialists and the result was terrible as Felipe González returned to win the election in 1988 and was president until 1996





el gatufo

No hay comentarios:

Publicar un comentario